Scenes

Register

?

All scenes containing file S1200.R.inflated_MSMAll.32k_fs_LR.surf.gii

Return to file details

Study: Rule Learning In Psychosis Risk

Study: Rule Learning In Psychosis Risk

Supplemental Figure 3

Study: Rule Learning In Psychosis Risk

Supplemental Figure 4

Study: Rule Learning In Psychosis Risk

Supplemental Figure 5

Study: Rule Learning In Psychosis Risk

Supplemental Figure 6

Study: Rule Learning In Psychosis Risk

Supplemental Figure 7

Study: Rule Learning In Psychosis Risk

Supplemental Figure 10

Study: Rule Learning In Psychosis Risk

Supplemental Figure 11

Study: Rule Learning In Psychosis Risk

Supplemental Figure 1

Study: Rule Learning In Psychosis Risk

Supplemental Figure 2

Study: Rule Learning In Psychosis Risk

Supplemental Figure 8

Study: Rule Learning In Psychosis Risk

Study: Rule Learning In Psychosis Risk

Study: Rule Learning In Psychosis Risk

Supplemental Figure 9

Study: Rule Learning In Psychosis Risk

Reference: Human HCP S1200 Structural + fMRI Atlas

HCP S1200 Average midthickness surfaces, folding overlay + average volumes (1096 subjects, MSM-All Registered)

Reference: Human HCP S1200 Structural + fMRI Atlas

HCP S1200 Individual Maps: myelin, thickness, curvature, sulc, midthickness vertex area

Reference: Human HCP S1200 Structural + fMRI Atlas

HCP S1200 Individual folding, sulc maps (1096 subjects, MSM-All Registered)

Reference: Human HCP S1200 Structural + fMRI Atlas

HCP S1200 Group Average Maps: myelin, thickness, curvature, sulc (1096 subjects, MSM-All Registered)

Reference: Human HCP S1200 Structural + fMRI Atlas

HCP S1200 Average task-fMRI Cohen's D effect-size maps (997 subjects, MSMAll vs. MSMSulc Registered)

Reference: Human HCP S1200 Structural + fMRI Atlas

Cortical Parcellations

Reference: Human HCP S1200 Structural + fMRI Atlas

Cortical Parcellations

Study: A tale of two n-backs

Fig4A_QTIM_PerformanceActivation_DLPFC

Study: A tale of two n-backs

Fig4B_HCP_PerformanceActivation_DLPFC

Study: A tale of two n-backs

Fig5A_QTIM_PerformanceActivation_MPFC

Study: A tale of two n-backs

Fig6A_QTIM_PerformanceActivation_WholeCortex

Study: A tale of two n-backs

Fig6B_HCP_PerformanceActivation_WholeCortex

Study: A tale of two n-backs

Fig7A_Combined_DLPFC_PerformanceActivationDifferences

Study: A tale of two n-backs

Fig7B_Combined_WholeCortex_PerformanceActivationDifferences

Study: A tale of two n-backs

QTIM_SignificantActivation_PositiveContrast_PeakTandPercentSignificant

Study: A tale of two n-backs

QTIM_SignificantActivation_NegativeContrast_PeakTandPercentSignificant

Study: A tale of two n-backs

HCP_SignificantActivation_PositiveContrast_PeakTandPercentSignificant

Study: A tale of two n-backs

HCP_SignificantActivation_NegativeContrast_PeakTandPercentSignificant

Study: A tale of two n-backs

QTIM_PerformanceActivation_PositiveContrast_DLPFC_PeakTandPercentSignificant

Study: A tale of two n-backs

HCP_PerformanceActivation_PositiveContrast_DLPFC_PeakTandPercentSignificant

Study: A tale of two n-backs

HCP_PerformanceActivation_NegativeContrast_DLPFC_PeakTandPercentSignificant

Study: A tale of two n-backs

QTIM_PerformanceActivation_NegativeContrast_MPFC_PeakTandPercentSignificant

Study: A tale of two n-backs

HCP_PerformanceActivation_PositiveContrast_MPFC_PeakTandPercentSignificant

Study: A tale of two n-backs

HCP_PerformanceActivation_NegativeContrast_MPFC_PeakTandPercentSignificant

Study: A tale of two n-backs

QTIM_PerformanceActivation_NegativeContrast_PeakTandPercentSignificant

Study: A tale of two n-backs

QTIMminusHCP_PerformanceActivationDifferences_WholeCortex

Study: A tale of two n-backs

Fig5B_HCP_PerformanceActivation_MPFC

Study: A tale of two n-backs

Fig3B_HCPSignificantActivation

Study: A tale of two n-backs

QTIM_PerformanceActivation_PositiveContrast_PeakTandPercentSignificant

Study: A tale of two n-backs

HCP_PerformanceActivation_NegativeContrast_PeakTandPercentSignificant

Study: A tale of two n-backs

Fig3A_QTIMSignificantActivation

Study: A tale of two n-backs

QTIM_PerformanceActivation_NegativeContrast_DLPFC_PeakTandPercentSignificant

Study: A tale of two n-backs

QTIMminusHCP_PerformanceActivationDifferences_DLPFC

Study: A tale of two n-backs

HCP_PerformanceActivation_PositiveContrast_PeakTandPercentSignificant

Study: IamBrain HCP Anatomy & Tractography Tutorial

Superior Thalamic Radiation (str); maps 36, 37 (Somatomotor, Cingulo-Opercular networks)

Study: IamBrain HCP Anatomy & Tractography Tutorial

Fronto-Aslant tract (fa); maps 16, 17 (Fronto-Parietal and language networks)

Study: IamBrain HCP Anatomy & Tractography Tutorial

Uncinate fasciculus (uf); maps 38, 39m(Fronto-Parietal, Cingulo-Opercular networks)

Study: IamBrain HCP Anatomy & Tractography Tutorial

Acoustic radiation (ar); maps 4, 5 (Auditory, Language networks)

Study: IamBrain HCP Anatomy & Tractography Tutorial

Superior longitudinal fasciculus 1 (SLF 1); maps 30, 31 (Somatomotor, Cingulo-Opercular networks)

Study: IamBrain HCP Anatomy & Tractography Tutorial

Group Average Surface Maps + Volume

Study: IamBrain HCP Anatomy & Tractography Tutorial

Group Average Story Task with Language Network (CAB-NP)

Study: IamBrain HCP Anatomy & Tractography Tutorial

Corticospinal tract (cst); surface maps 14, 15 (Somatomotor network)

Study: IamBrain HCP Anatomy & Tractography Tutorial

Optic radiation (or); maps 28, 29 (Visual, Visual 2, Auditory, Cingulo-Opercular networks); centered on left LGN seed

Study: IamBrain HCP Anatomy & Tractography Tutorial

Optic radiation (or); maps 28, 29 (Visual, Visual 2, Auditory, Cingulo-Opercular networks); centered midway along left optic radiation

Study: IamBrain HCP Anatomy & Tractography Tutorial

Anterior Thalamic Radiation (atr); maps 6, 7 (Fronto-Parietal, Default networks)

Study: IamBrain HCP Anatomy & Tractography Tutorial

Anterior commissure (ac); map 1

Study: IamBrain HCP Anatomy & Tractography Tutorial

Cingulum bundle dorsal (cpd); maps 8, 9 (Cingulo-Opercular, Default networks)

Study: IamBrain HCP Anatomy & Tractography Tutorial

Cingulum bundle temporal (cbt); maps 12. 13 (Default network)

Study: IamBrain HCP Anatomy & Tractography Tutorial

Forceps minor (fmi); map 19 (Default network)

Study: IamBrain HCP Anatomy & Tractography Tutorial

Forceps major (fma) map 18 (Visual, Visual 2 networks)

Study: IamBrain HCP Anatomy & Tractography Tutorial

Fornix (fx); maps 20, 21 (Default network)

Study: IamBrain HCP Anatomy & Tractography Tutorial

Inferior longitudinal fasciculus (ilf); maps 24, 25 (Default, Fronto-Parietal networks)

Study: IamBrain HCP Anatomy & Tractography Tutorial

Middle longitudinal fasciculus (mdlf); maps 26, 27 (language, auditory, Visual2, dorsal attn networks)

Study: IamBrain HCP Anatomy & Tractography Tutorial

Vertical occipital fasciculus (vof); maps 40, 41 (Visual2 network)

Study: IamBrain HCP Anatomy & Tractography Tutorial

Arcuate fasciculus (af) maps 2, 3 (Language, Cingulo-Opercular, Dorsal Attention networks)

Study: IamBrain HCP Anatomy & Tractography Tutorial

Inferior Fronto-Occipital fasciculus (ifo); maps 22, 23 (CO, OA, Vis, Vis2, Default networks)

Study: IamBrain HCP Anatomy & Tractography Tutorial

Cortical Parcellations

Study: IamBrain HCP Anatomy & Tractography Tutorial

Cingulum bundle peri-genual (cbp); maps 10,11 (Default, Cingulo-Opercular networks)

Study: IamBrain HCP Anatomy & Tractography Tutorial

Superior longitudinal fasciculus 2 (slf2); maps 32, 33 (Fronto-Parietal, Dorsal Attention, Default, and Somatosensory networks)

Study: IamBrain HCP Anatomy & Tractography Tutorial

Superior longitudinal fasciculus 3 (slf 3); maps 34, 35 (Fronto-Parietal, Cingulo-Opercular networks)

Study: IamBrain HCP Anatomy & Tractography Tutorial

Middle cerebellar peduncle (mcp); no matching surface map

Study: IamBrain HCP Anatomy & Tractography Tutorial

Language network areas (annotated with area names)

Reference: Human Cortical Parcellations

Probabilistic areas MMP1.0 210V

Reference: Human Cortical Parcellations

Yeo et al. (2011) 17-network RSNs with CAB-NP RSN borders overlaid

Reference: Human Cortical Parcellations

MMP1.0 210V Parcellation on inflated surfaces

Reference: Human Cortical Parcellations

Gordon333 resting-state-network parcellation with MMP1.0 210V borders overlaid)

Reference: Human Cortical Parcellations

VDG11 Composite parcellation with MMP1.0 210V borders overlaid

Reference: Human Cortical Parcellations

MMP1.0 210V parcel borders overlaid on S1200 group-average myelin maps

Reference: Human Cortical Parcellations

MMP1.0 210V Parcellation on flatmaps

Reference: Human Cortical Parcellations

Cole-Anticevic Brain Network Parcellation (CAB-NP) + MMP1.0 210P borders

Reference: Human Cortical Parcellations

Human Cortical Lobes (from PALS_B12 atlas) with HCP_MMP borders overlaid

Study: Functionally and structurally distinct fusiform face area(s) in over 1000 participants

32k_fs_LR - Probabilistic Map

Study: Functionally and structurally distinct fusiform face area(s) in over 1000 participants

32k_fs_LR - Individual FFA

Study: Functionally and structurally distinct fusiform face area(s) in over 1000 participants

32k_fs_LR - Face-Selective Activation

Study: Functionally and structurally distinct fusiform face area(s) in over 1000 participants

32k_fs_LR - FFC Parcellation

Study: Functionally and structurally distinct fusiform face area(s) in over 1000 participants

32k_fs_LR - Maximum Probability Map

Study: The Lifespan Human Connectome Project in Development: A large-scale study of brain connectivity development in 5-21 year olds

Study: The Lifespan Human Connectome Project in Development: A large-scale study of brain connectivity development in 5-21 year olds

Study: The Lifespan Human Connectome Project in Development: A large-scale study of brain connectivity development in 5-21 year olds

Study: Comparative Connectomics of the Primate Social Brain

Face-selective patches in marmosets, macaques, and humans.

Study: fMRI Test-Retest Reliability of SST

Fig2_ICCs_MZ_TwinCorrelations

Study: fMRI Test-Retest Reliability of SST

FigS10_FDRCorrected_SignificantActivations

Study: Test-retest reliability of fMRI

Fig2_Parametric

Study: Test-retest reliability of fMRI

Fig3_Parametric

Study: Test-retest reliability of fMRI

Fig2_Categorical

Study: Test-retest reliability of fMRI

Suppl_Fig13_Categorical

Study: Test-retest reliability of fMRI

Fig3_Categorical

Study: Test-retest reliability of fMRI

Study: Test-retest reliability of fMRI

Study: Test-retest reliability of fMRI

Suppl_Fig13_Parametric

Study: Impact of Dimensionality on Reliability

Figure 2. Coherence Reliability within Canonical Cortical Networks

Study: Impact of Dimensionality on Reliability

Figure 3. Connectivity Reliability within Canonical Cortical Networks

Study: Impact of Dimensionality on Reliability

Figure 1. Cortical parcellations with ICA along with the Gordon and Glasser atlases

©2024 Washington University School of Medicine